#4739 vaya vaya, el pedazo de mierda con pasta que se cree el nuevo Assange, que curioso que solo saque leaks de los demócratas.
#4740
A lo que voy amic es a que traes esto:
Después sueltas esto:
#4700senzye:El 75% de los posters habituales de este hilo triggereados con la cámara de eco que os habéis montado aquí. Ya lo sabía. Tenéis el compás moral roto.
Y resulta que en toda esa lista de censuras el amigo Elon ha omitido peticiones de los no wokes, casi como si buscase vender un relato de que hay un bando buscando oprimir cuando realmente es una pelea con dos caras intentando usar la mismas herramientas en una plataforma privada y gestionada por terceros.
#4742 La censura ha venido mayoritariamente desde la ideología que tenía Twitter y los shadowbans al 100%.
Dicho esto, totalmente cierto. Elon no ha dicho absolutamente nada que yo sepa de la parte de corrupción que involucra a los Republicanos, empezando con que esta mierda empezó en la legislatura de Trump. Claramente está intentando ganar unas demográficas y claramente está resentido con lo woke / los wokes y con los Demócratas en general por múltiples razones. La máquina del fango y que una de sus hijas con su ex reciente se haya vuelto trans y ambas en contra suya seguro que son factores. La guerra ideológica en USA está más caliente que nunca en la historia reciente. No es una persona imparcial y cada día lo es menos, espero que no haya efecto péndulo en Twitter, por mucho que no le gusten / me gusten las ideas o acciones de esa ideología o demográficas y mantenga esos principios que tanto habla para todo el mundo que los cumpla.
#4743
La censura solo puede existir por parte de los que formen parte del gobierno en cada momento y soliciten algo de ese tipo. Que dos empresas privadas (Twitter y la campaña de X candidato) lleguen a un acuerdo no es censura, que la Casa Blanca solicite el borrado de un tweet si es intento de censura.
Creo que la fase de explicar que la primera enmienda solo aplica al estado ya la habíamos pasado, pero por ejemplo recordamos por aquí:
The First Amendment only prevents government restrictions on speech. It does not prevent restrictions on speech imposed by private individuals or businesses. Facebook and other social media can regulate or restrict speech hosted on their platforms because they are private entities.
- Censura en plataformas como definición puede existir sin que esté involucrado el Gobierno: En X plataforma se censura Y expresión de Z ideología.
- Todo este lío de Twitter Files es por la fusión de agencias de triples letras (Gobierno) con Twitter.
Un placer poder debatir contigo decentemente btw
Elon Musk fires a top Twitter engineer over his declining view count
https://www.platformer.news/p/elon-musk-fires-a-top-twitter-engineer?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
On Tuesday, Musk gathered a group of engineers and advisors into a room at Twitter’s headquarters looking for answers. Why are his engagement numbers tanking?
“This is ridiculous,” he said, according to multiple sources with direct knowledge of the meeting. “I have more than 100 million followers, and I’m only getting tens of thousands of impressions.” One of the company’s two remaining principal engineers offered a possible explanation for Musk’s declining reach: just under a year after the Tesla CEO made his surprise offer to buy Twitter for $44 billion, public interest in his antics is waning. Employees showed Musk internal data regarding engagement with his account, along with a Google Trends chart. Last April, they told him, Musk was at “peak” popularity in search rankings, indicated by a score of “100.” Today, he’s at a score of nine. Engineers had previously investigated whether Musk’s reach had somehow been artificially restricted, but found no evidence that the algorithm was biased against him. Musk did not take the news well. “You’re fired, you’re fired,” Musk told the engineer. (Platformer is withholding the engineer’s name in light of the harassment Musk has directed at former Twitter employees.) Dissatisfied with engineers’ work so far, Musk has instructed employees to track how many times each of his tweets are recommended, according to one current worker. It has now been seven weeks since Twitter added public view counts for every tweet. At the time, Musk promised that the feature would give the world a better sense of how vibrant the platform is. “Shows how much more alive Twitter is than it may seem, as over 90% of Twitter users read, but don’t tweet, reply or like, as those are public actions,” he tweeted. Almost two months later, though, view counts have had the opposite effect, emphasizing how little engagement most posts get relative to their audience size. At the same time, Twitter usage in the United States has declined almost 9 percent since Musk’s takeover, according to one recent study. Twitter sources say the view count feature itself may be contributing to the decline in engagement, and therefore views. The like and retweet buttons were made smaller to accommodate the display of views, making them harder to easily tap. An even more obvious reason for the decline in engagement is Twitter’s increasingly glitchy product, which has baffled users with its disappearing mentions, shifting algorithmic priorities, and tweets inserted seemingly at random from accounts they don’t follow. On Wednesday, the company suffered one of its first major outages since Musk took over, with users being told, inexplicably, “You are over the daily limit for sending tweets.” It turns out that an employee had inadvertently deleted data for an internal service that sets rate limits for using Twitter. The team that worked on that service left the company in November. “As the adage goes, ‘you ship your org chart,’” said one current employee. “It’s chaos here right now, so we’re shipping chaos”
#4747 debe de ser jodido gastarse 44.000 millones en comprarte un altavoz para que luego no te haga caso ni cristo
La gente está subiendo películas enteras que cargan perfectamente y luego me es imposible ver un clip de 10 segundos
Y resulta que Twitter no se cayó, que funciona bastante mejor xD
Mira que Elon me parece un subnormal, pero tampoco era para tanto.
Me hace gracia la gente que piensa que tu free speech es decir lo que quieras en el patio de otro. Chaval, móntate un web y si te hacen un DDoS o te mandan a juicio ya hablas de free speech. Han cambiado RSS y los pingbacks por redes sociales privadas y algoritmos opacos y ahora se quejan.
Grande Eloooon jajajaja
Partiéndole la madre a los escociditos. Y ya si compra el ManU se condecora el cabrón.
