Three team trade that I think would be beneficial to all teams involved. I think it's very reasonable especially when you consider the economy and how valuable expiring contracts have become in recent years.
Boston receives
Tyson Chandler
Stephen Jackson
Corey Maggette
Boston does it because they get 3 rotation type players (1 starter in Maggette or Jackson and another potential one in Chandler if he starts over Perk) and fill two of the major needs Doc addressed by giving up one 34 year-old starter.
Quote:
I’d say we have to get a (center) first, and we have to get a small forward. Then there’s the point guard situation.”
We obviously value Maggette, as we went after him last year, and this will also give us a larger championship potential window as Chandler (26), Jackson (31) and Maggette (29) have a lot more left than Allen. We also still would have the MLE and LLE to work with.
Golden State receives
Peja Stojakovic
Tony Allen
Brian Scalabrine
JR Giddens
Antonio Daniels
Golden St. does it because they save themselves 18M in contracts in 2010, 19.5M in 2011, and 21M in 2012, by trading off Jackson and Maggette for a bunch of expiring contracts. Some (Daniels & Scalabrine immediately come to mind) who have high contract buyout potential and would allow GS the opportunity to save even more money. This also allows their younger players to get more PT and a chance to develop.
They also finally get rid of Crawford who is Nelson's doghouse.
New Orleans receives
Ray Allen
Jamal Crawford
NO does it because they unload the two contracts they are trying to get rid of in Chandler and Stojakovic. Stoja and Crawford are basically a swap for each other, but with that swap NO saves themselves approx. 10M. Not to mention the near 19M that comes off the books next off-season with RA's expiring deal.
Se comenta algo asi por los foros americanos aunque yo no vendería a Ray ni de coña.